For years, KCB Group has portrayed itself as a bank winning the war against fraud.
The numbers tell a far more troubling story.
Buried inside the lender’s latest sustainability disclosures is a statistic that should alarm shareholders, regulators and millions of customers who trust the bank with their savings. Sixty employees were dismissed in 2025 for involvement in fraud schemes targeting the bank and its customers.
That is not merely a disciplinary matter. It is the highest number of fraud-related dismissals recorded by the bank in at least a decade and almost double the 34 employees fired the previous year. Just two years earlier, the figure stood at 22. Â
The surge raises a disturbing question.
How does an institution that spends billions on technology, compliance systems, audits and risk management continue to uncover growing numbers of employees exploiting the very systems they are paid to protect?
The answer may lie in a reality Kenya’s banking sector rarely discusses publicly: insider fraud has become one of the industry’s most persistent and dangerous threats.
KCB’s own disclosures reveal a pattern that is difficult to dismiss as isolated misconduct. Over the past decade, the bank has dismissed more than 250 employees for fraud-related conduct. These are not allegations. These are cases that went through internal investigations and disciplinary processes and resulted in termination. Â
Taken together, they paint a picture of an institution engaged in a continuous purge of rogue employees while struggling to eliminate the conditions that keep producing them.
The scale of the problem becomes even clearer when viewed alongside some of the fraud scandals that have rocked the bank in recent years.
In one of the most notorious cases, four KCB employees were arrested in 2018 after investigators accused them of siphoning more than Sh72 million through a sophisticated scheme involving 37 fictitious merchant companies. The suspects allegedly created fake businesses, processed fraudulent point-of-sale transactions, approved those transactions internally and distributed the proceeds through mobile money channels. Â
The operation was not the work of outsiders breaching the bank’s systems. It was allegedly designed and executed by insiders using institutional access and knowledge.
The same year, another scandal erupted after Sh20.6 million disappeared from a KCB branch strong room in Wundanyi. Investigators quickly concluded that the theft bore the hallmarks of an inside job because the individuals responsible for safeguarding the vault were among the prime suspects. Â
Such cases expose a fundamental weakness in modern banking.
Banks can invest heavily in cybersecurity, artificial intelligence and fraud detection software, but those systems become significantly less effective when the threat originates from employees who understand how the controls work.
The worrying trend at KCB mirrors a broader deterioration across Kenya’s financial sector.
According to Central Bank of Kenya data, reported banking fraud cases more than doubled in 2024, while losses surged to Sh1.59 billion. Mobile banking fraud alone accounted for hundreds of millions of shillings in losses. Â
Investigators have repeatedly pointed to insiders as the critical link connecting many of these schemes.
Whether through leaked customer data, unauthorized approvals, compromised credentials or collusion with criminal networks, employees increasingly feature at the centre of some of the industry’s largest fraud cases.
Yet perhaps the most troubling aspect of the KCB figures is what they reveal about governance.
The bank reported fewer fraud incidents and lower blocked losses in 2025 than the previous year. Yet the number of employees dismissed surged to a record high. Â
One interpretation is that KCB has become better at detecting wrongdoing.
Another, more unsettling explanation is that the fraud schemes are becoming smaller, faster and harder to detect, requiring larger networks of insiders operating beneath the radar.
Either way, a bank does not dismiss 60 employees in a single year unless it is confronting a serious internal integrity problem.
The crisis also highlights a longstanding regulatory blind spot.
Kenya’s banking industry still lacks a comprehensive mechanism for sharing information about employees dismissed for fraud. Critics argue that individuals terminated for serious ethical breaches can often move between institutions with limited scrutiny, creating opportunities for misconduct to reappear elsewhere in the financial system. Â
For KCB, the record purge should not be viewed as proof that the problem is under control.
If anything, it suggests the opposite.
After more than a decade of dismissals, investigations, arrests and public commitments to tighten controls, the bank continues to uncover growing numbers of insiders willing to exploit customer trust for personal gain.
The real story is not that KCB fired 60 employees.
The real story is that Kenya’s biggest bank felt compelled to fire 60 employees in the first place. That number is not evidence of victory. It is evidence of how deeply the problem has become embedded.
